The
possibility of these foreign beings’ existence fills us with an overwhelming
number of questions and invades our heart with a warm though often scary
astonishment.
In my experience, most people with whom I have had the opportunity to
exchange were most definitely certain that these beings do not only accommodate
Sci.Fi scriptwriter but truly exist and that their future delightful discovery
awaits us all.
This is all
very exciting, but let’s have a look at it in an objective, scientific way.
It is true
that in the observable Universe, there are approximately 100 billion galaxies,
each of them with at least as many stars and even more planets... But it would
not be very effective to take into consideration anything other than our local
group, since with the expansion of the Universe, it would be impossible to
reach any further ! Therefore, to be able to have an interaction with a space
being, we must concentrate on our home galaxy, the grandiose Milky Way.
The Milky
Way presents over 10,000 stars for every grain of sand on Earth . It is
estimated that about a fifth of these stars have an Earth-sized planet located
in the Goldilocks-zone: the area around a star where the temperature is just
right for liquid water (and therefore a possibility for life) to form on this
planet.
If only
0.1% of these planets developed life, there would still be over a million
populated planets in our local group.
Moreover, the earliest known life form on Earth, time wise, only stands
for 27% of the Milky way's existence and we, as humans, only for 0.0019%.
This adds
multiple billions of changes for life to develop on other planets in the past.
After emerging into a civilization, life has every reason to transform
into a bigger one. These reasons can be
-
economical, in our scale : as with the exploitation of America,
- for
survival, as Stephen Hawking wants us to leave Earth since it is going to die
soon,
- to avoid
tensions, for example when Abraham asked Lot to separate, to not have any
quarreling, etc.
The
Kardashev scale explains that we would start with a type 1 civilization, which
can use all the energy on its planet, then a type 2 which can do the same with
its sun (Dyson sphere), type 3, with all its local group, etc.
(Earth is
currently at 0.73).
But where is
all this life? Shouldn't space be filled with advanced technological
spaceships?
This is what
is known as the Fermi Paradox.
Enrico Fermi
was an Italian physicist from the first half of the 20th century and creator of
the first nuclear reactor.
He found
sense in his paradox by wondering if there was a limit to technology (including
that it would not be possible to become a type 2 or 3 civilization) or by
adding some kind of a great filter.
If there
really is a technological limit, it would be the end of our Paradox, meaning
that we will never find life and will just have to live alone. But scientists
are perplexed by the idea.
Another
option, the great filter is one or several monstrous events which make it
impossible (or extremely hard) for life to pass to the next level of
civilization ( type) destroying everything in the process.
One can
therefore assume two different options:
- In the
first case, this filter may be behind us, making us special and maybe the first
civilization or even form of life. This barrier could have consisted of a
great number of factors needing to create life or the rarity of our planet.
- Or more
likely, in the second case, this great filter is in front of us and it is only
an amount of time before it destroys us... It could consist of an inevitable
disease, artificial intelligence, nuclear war, our own bad maintenance of Earth
or even the first type 3 civilization which annihilates life when it is
developed enough to avoid competition (Hawking and others have warned us about
messages in space, which could attract an ancient Godlike civilization).
Odds seem to
lean towards the second possibility since scientifically the barriers that
Humans have passed don't seem too complex.
After what
has been said, as Nick Bostrom explains well, the worst possible information
that could be presented on the news is the discovery of Aliens. Indeed, finding
other beings (the more complex, the worse) would remove the possibility of
the filter being behind us, of us being unique and therefore that the barrier
is in front of us !
In
conclusion, I hope that the next time you have the breathtaking opportunity to
look up to the stars, you won't be so excited by the idea of finding extraterrestrial
life. And if you are a conspiracy believer and that you think the government
hides Aliens in Area 51, I'm afraid that we are all already doomed !
On a more
serious note, we, as human, are great thinkers, creators but we are not
perfect. We should take more time to think about consequences before actions
since we only, or at least so far, have one Earth and can easily destroy it and
ourselves in the process.
For the
moment, we can only assume that we are the only living creatures of this
beautiful architecture of the cosmos which is our home. This thought leaves us
with the unique and spectacular gift of being its feeling and thinking, to be a
part of its grandiose beauty, to be its mind and soul.
James
Wow really interesting as always James ! I agree with your conclusion, we must protect this world so I would recommend everyone to use Ecosia, it's a search engine that plants trees ! Thanks for opening my eyes, Eoan.
ReplyDeleteYou can pry my excitement at the idea of extra-terrestrial civilisations out of my cold, dead hands.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting post, despite the dipressing conclusion.
Very lovely article speaking of your evident strong interest for Physics! Although the prospect of extraterrestrial life seems quite exciting when you are quite a fan of Sci-Fi, I do not believe that a form of life as developped as human beings exists for the moment, although there might be an existing one at a much, much smaller scale, which, don't get me wrong, is already a form of life, but probably not as "exciting" or terrifying as what we could picture. I agree with some parts of the conclusion; when it comes to the long-term necessity of protecting the environment because it is a precious place/planet giving humans shelter, which is the only one that we know of today offering humans such a habitable climate, but it is also important to remember that different policies have been put in place to reduce environmental damage, that world leaders, despite all potential threats, are fully aware of potential impacts of a Third World (Nuclear) War, and that, perhaps, it is also non negligible to realize that actions have been undertaken to prevent/or to at least postpone "the end of the world", and to perhaps end on a note of hope rather than on a seemingly immediate & thus unrealistic promise of "doom".
ReplyDeleteKeep up your vivid liking for Science!
-Emma P.